Google真的会退出中国吗？

发布:北京SEO | 时间: 2010年1月13日 | 分类:互联网大记事 | 评论:2 | 引用:0 | 浏览: | 原创文章，转载请注明出处，谢谢。

今天很早的时候就看到这则新闻，QQ群已经风传Google在其博客宣称www.google.cn即将推出中国市场。

Google退出中国新闻如下：

美国谷歌周二表示，不再愿意继续对谷歌中国的搜索结果进行审查，这可能将不得不关闭Google.cn站点和在中国的办公室，并称此举与其Gmail邮箱有关。谷歌称：“我们认识到，这很可能意味着必须关闭Google.cn，并有可能关闭我们驻中国的办事处。”

Google退出中国英文原文

A new approach to China

1/12/2010 03:00:00 PM

Like many other well-known organizations, we face cyber attacks of varying degrees on a regular basis. In mid-December, we detected a highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China that resulted in the theft of intellectual property from Google. However, it soon became clear that what at first appeared to be solely a security incident--albeit a significant one--was something quite different.

First, this attack was not just on Google. As part of our investigation we have discovered that at least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses--including the Internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors--have been similarly targeted. We are currently in the process of notifying those companies, and we are also working with the relevant U.S. authorities.

Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. Based on our investigation to date we believe their attack did not achieve that objective. Only two Gmail accounts appear to have been accessed, and that activity was limited to account information (such as the date the account was created) and subject line, rather than the content of emails themselves.

Third, as part of this investigation but independent of the attack on Google, we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties. These accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware placed on the users' computers.

We have already used information gained from this attack to make infrastructure and architectural improvements that enhance security for Google and for our users. In terms of individual users, we would advise people to deploy reputable anti-virus and anti-spyware programs on their computers, to install patches for their operating systems and to update their web browsers. Always be cautious when clicking on links appearing in instant messages and emails, or when asked to share personal information like passwords online. You can read more here about our cyber-security recommendations. People wanting to learn more about these kinds of attacks can read this U.S. government report (PDF), Nart Villeneuve's blog and this presentation on the GhostNet spying incident.

We have taken the unusual step of sharing information about these attacks with a broad audience not just because of the security and human rights implications of what we have unearthed, but also because this information goes to the heart of a much bigger global debate about freedom of speech. In the last two decades, China's economic reform programs and its citizens' entrepreneurial flair have lifted hundreds of millions of Chinese people out of poverty. Indeed, this great nation is at the heart of much economic progress and development in the world today.

We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that "we will carefully monitor conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China."

These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered--combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web--have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

The decision to review our business operations in China has been incredibly hard, and we know that it will have potentially far-reaching consequences. We want to make clear that this move was driven by our executives in the United States, without the knowledge or involvement of our employees in China who have worked incredibly hard to make Google.cn the success it is today. We are committed to working responsibly to resolve the very difficult issues raised.

Posted by David Drummond, SVP, Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer

对Google来说，这是个艰难的决定。对我来说，这是个痛苦的选择。我的大部分在线生活，依托于Google。我使用Google搜索，用Gmail收发邮件，用Google Reader阅读我订阅的大量内容，用Google Docs处理所有办公文档，用Picasa处理照片并进行地理标注……所有这一切，都没有任何可替代的第三方工具。且不说还有大量的中国企业，比如阿里巴巴，需要依赖Google的搜索和广告进行全球营销。

我也知道，在过去四年中，Google一直都存在退出中国的可能，开复像个救火队员一样穿梭斡旋过很多次。今天的结果，大概是Google在对中国业务做了全面评估之后，做出的一个无可奈何的决定。对中国政府来说，既然你需要中国这个市场，你就得听我的招呼。但对Google来说，它更愿意玩一个规则透明的游戏。况且，过去四年动辄得咎的现状，也让Google明白，预期的商业利益，将始终受到严格的限制。而黑箱式的搜索结果屏蔽和妥协，却让它不得不承担越来越大的道义压力。

对我来说，Google是全球最好的知识管理工具和生产力工具，但中国的监管当局并不这么看，意识形态是他们更加关心的东西。我相信，Google的这份摊牌声明，也会被看做一种意识形态的花招，招致中国政府更大的愤怒。在未来的岁月中，我可能不得不费更大的力气去访问那些我已经无法离开的Google工具，这是我必须承受的后果。

YouTube、Facebook、Twitter、Blogger、WordPress、Google……全世界最好的网站和服务，一个个远离中国，可能是我们这个时代作为中国人最大的悲哀。

谷歌离开中国的三大原因猜测

谷歌离开中国市场的原因我想主要有三：

其一、谷歌中国没有合适的领军人。在李开复离开谷歌的时候，笔者曾经撰文《李开复接班人的三个条件》，并分析了当前谷歌难找到合适的领军者，所谓火车跑得快要靠车头带，没有领军人，当然谷歌中国的本土化和品牌塑造会比较吃力，这极大的动摇了谷歌美国对中国市场的信心。

其二，政策和法规不同，让谷歌无法适从。我曾经多次提出，互联网不是卖技术和产品，卖的是本土化和用户习惯。而本土化是互联网公司成功的关键，卓越亚马逊无法对抗淘宝、twitter、facebook在中国没戏，反而QQ和新浪微博大行其道，这就是本土化的力量。

作为外来者，谷歌很难认清中国政策，难以把握中国政策的变化，所以总是在触碰高压线，以前李开复在位的时候还好些，其公关能力还比较强，现在谷歌靠谁来搞公关？所以本土化成谷歌无法继续中国市场的原因之一，而且美国人也不喜欢搞公关。

其三，谷歌连续遭遇危机，惹恼了谷歌美国。谷歌被央视曝光涉黄、谷歌图书馆计划遭遇起诉，并且政府相关部门也出面职责谷歌不妥，李开复离职等等，这一切都让谷歌总部很头痛。选择退出显示出美国人的果断与冲动，就如同微软被欧盟惹恼之后，直接将 windows内置浏览器删掉一样，最后让欧盟无所适从。谷歌离开中国，估计有很多网民感觉到悲伤，毕竟30%的份额不是小数字，有1亿多网民在用谷歌，这种搜索习惯一旦养成，他们很难放弃谷歌。

谷歌离开中国的四大后果

谷歌离开中国会产生三大后果：

其一，百度股价会上涨，毕竟没了直接对手。我们看到谷歌在博客上宣布考虑退出中国之后，百度虽然遭遇黑客攻击，但是股价仍上涨了7%。这也说明，股民和外界对谷歌离开中国所产生的冲击波之巨大的认同。

其二，腾讯搜搜、搜狐搜狗、百度有道可能会迎来机会。搜搜从使用谷歌搜索结果，到自己研发搜索，已经有一年之久，现在谷歌如果真的离开，那腾讯的搜索计划就没白忙活，因为有了市场空间。而一直安于一隅的搜狗估计也能有出头的机会，而有道也能抢得市场空间。

其三，无所适从的网民会集体反对谷歌离开。说实在的，听到谷歌离开中国感觉心理很难过。毕竟很多工作都需要通过谷歌搜索来完成，而且只能用谷歌才可以搜的到，现在谷歌说要离开，我想很多人会感觉痛心，联起手来反对谷歌离开是不是能起到作用？

就像昨天早上，我着急查找一个网络驱动软件的问题，在百度知道里有，可惜百度上不了，让我非常的着急。同样，如果我在查找一个资料，百度找不到，谷歌能找到，可惜谷歌不能用了，这也会让我着急不堪。谷歌与百度，两者谁都不能缺，因为他们各有自己的优势，也可以相互制衡，有利于搜索行业的发展，同时也让用户可以多种选择。

其四，广告主不满意，站长们惊慌。谷歌离开中国之后，估计百度一家独大，造成了垄断的市场格局，这会让广告主面临关键字广告提价的压力，因此广告主们不愿看到这一点。此外，有一大部分站长基于谷歌做了大量的SEO工作，一旦谷歌离开，网站流量会急剧下降，他们的营收也都靠谷歌广告联盟，所以对他们来说也是巨大的打击。

百度网站首页打不开-1月12日 2000年到2010年谷歌（GG）pr（PageRank）更新时间表百度,Google,雅虎等搜索引擎蜘蛛名称北京SEO教程-网站目标关键词的选取

本文来源于：北京SEO http://www.fireseo.com.cn/ , 原文地址：http://www.fireseo.com.cn/Internet/Google-say-Goodbye/

相关标签：谷歌 Google新闻 Google
引用通告：点击这里获取该日志的TrackBack引用地址

相关文章:
2000年到2010年谷歌（GG）pr（PageRank）更新时间表 (2010-1-7 8:34:3)
百度的进步，谷歌是一个不错的学习对象 (2009-12-26 20:44:13)
做sp的要小心了 (2009-11-30 22:29:59)
GOOGLE地图--对于站长比百度竞价还讨厌 (2009-10-31 20:38:36)
怎样登上Google NO1 (2009-7-10 21:16:40)

1. 星默 2010-1-14 20:13:50
中国外交部回应谷歌退出：中国的互联网是开放的
回复该留言

2. 星默 2010-1-14 20:53:45
外交部：中国互联网是开放的管理措施国际通行
http://news.qq.com/a/20100114/002791.htm

看看视频
回复该留言

发表评论

◎欢迎参与讨论，请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。

北京SEO

最新文章

随机推荐

热门标签

网站收藏

Google真的会退出中国吗？